Skip to main content
typos, clarification
Source Link
Lars Bosteen
  • 107.8k
  • 11
  • 13

Note that the Lollard question you linked tooto was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopefulhopefully help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and that it isn't too broad. Ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

The fact that you've gone to the trouble of asking here on Meta shows that you've thought about this - most closed questions lack research, clearly haven't been thought through and / or are posted in bad faith. None of these would appear to be the case with you. Even so, we all slip up sometimes, but it's not the end of the world if it gets closed as it can be edited and submitted for reopening by the community. If you are genuinely seeking a constructive answer, go ahead and post your question.

Note that the Lollard question you linked too was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopeful help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and that it isn't too broad. Ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

The fact that you've gone to the trouble of asking here shows that you've thought about this - most closed questions lack research, clearly haven't been thought through and / or are posted in bad faith. None of these would appear to be the case with you. Even so, we all slip up sometimes, but it's not the end of the world if it gets closed. If you are genuinely seeking a constructive answer, go ahead and post your question.

Note that the Lollard question you linked to was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopefully help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and that it isn't too broad. Ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

The fact that you've gone to the trouble of asking here on Meta shows that you've thought about this - most closed questions lack research, clearly haven't been thought through and / or are posted in bad faith. None of these would appear to be the case with you. Even so, we all slip up sometimes, but it's not the end of the world if it gets closed as it can be edited and submitted for reopening by the community. If you are genuinely seeking a constructive answer, go ahead and post your question.

added text
Source Link
Lars Bosteen
  • 107.8k
  • 11
  • 13

Note that the Lollard question you linked too was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopeful help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and askthat it isn't too broad. Ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

The fact that you've gone to the trouble of asking here shows that you've thought about this - most closed questions lack research, clearly haven't been thought through and / or are posted in bad faith. None of these would appear to be the case with you. Even so, we all slip up sometimes, but it's not the end of the world if it gets closed. If you are genuinely seeking a constructive answer, go ahead and post your question.

Note that the Lollard question was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopeful help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

Note that the Lollard question you linked too was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopeful help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and that it isn't too broad. Ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'

The fact that you've gone to the trouble of asking here shows that you've thought about this - most closed questions lack research, clearly haven't been thought through and / or are posted in bad faith. None of these would appear to be the case with you. Even so, we all slip up sometimes, but it's not the end of the world if it gets closed. If you are genuinely seeking a constructive answer, go ahead and post your question.

Source Link
Lars Bosteen
  • 107.8k
  • 11
  • 13

Note that the Lollard question was closed as too basic, not because it was vague or opinion based. A cursory search of questions shows that most "What is/was the significance of..." questions have remained open.

It's hard to know what will happen to yours without seeing it. If there is something wrong with it, comments will hopeful help you to edit it into shape. Make sure you demonstrate prior research, and ask yourself 'Is there likely to be evidence to back up an answer?'