added 108 characters in body
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 69.7k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 21

Question touches heavily trolled topic andand lacks to be expected quality

Current site policy has been the following:

Questions on these topics have a hair-trigger for being put on hold. This goes in particular for new users who don't have a proven track-record of asking good questions.

Questions on these topics have a hair-trigger for being put on hold. This goes in particular for new users who don't have a proven track-record of asking good questions.

There is a certain quality bar that all questions on SE sites in general, and this site in particular, must reach in order to remain open. However, questions on these topics in particular, due to excessive past abuse, are not given nearly as much leeway.

These questions can't be sort of on topic, or even mostly on topic, they must be fully on topic. They are expected to fully comply with our SE help center guidelines, and with our site expectations for good questions. Any issues with this that are pointed out in comments, particularly those with multiple upvotes, are expected to be promptly acted upon by the poster. User edits to fix perceived problems should not be blindly reverted. If this is a problem for a new user, they should probably start their participation experience with another topic where the standards aren't as strict.

There is a certain quality bar that all questions on SE sites in general, and this site in particular, must reach in order to remain open. However, questions on these topics in particular, due to excessive past abuse, are not given nearly as much leeway.

Text:

These questions can't be sort of on topic, or even mostly on topic, they must be fully on topic. They are expectedas inspiration to fully comply with our SE help center guidelines, and with our site expectations for good questions. Any issues with this that are pointed outbe used in comments, particularly those with multiple upvotes,such situations that are expected to be promptly acted upon by the poster. User edits to fix perceived problems should not be blindly reverted. If this is a problem for a new user, they should probably start their participation experience with another topic where the standards aren't as strict.just full-on trolling:

Text:

Welcome! Please consider this: According to site policy for very heavily trolled topics: questions on these must reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question "must fully comply" with the guidelines set forth in help, ask and site expectations for good questions. Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Source to copy & paste:

[Welcome!](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3988) Please consider this: [According to site policy site policy for very heavily trolled topics](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3683/) questions on these *must* reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question *"must fully comply"* with the guidelines set forth in [help], [ask] and [site expectations for good questions](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/618/why-did-i-get-a-downvote). Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Question touches heavily trolled topic and lacks quality

Current site policy has been the following:

Questions on these topics have a hair-trigger for being put on hold. This goes in particular for new users who don't have a proven track-record of asking good questions.

There is a certain quality bar that all questions on SE sites in general, and this site in particular, must reach in order to remain open. However, questions on these topics in particular, due to excessive past abuse, are not given nearly as much leeway.

These questions can't be sort of on topic, or even mostly on topic, they must be fully on topic. They are expected to fully comply with our SE help center guidelines, and with our site expectations for good questions. Any issues with this that are pointed out in comments, particularly those with multiple upvotes, are expected to be promptly acted upon by the poster. User edits to fix perceived problems should not be blindly reverted. If this is a problem for a new user, they should probably start their participation experience with another topic where the standards aren't as strict.

Text:

Welcome! Please consider this: According to site policy for very heavily trolled topics: questions on these must reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question "must fully comply" with the guidelines set forth in help, ask and site expectations for good questions. Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Source to copy & paste:

[Welcome!](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3988) Please consider this: [According to site policy site policy for very heavily trolled topics](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3683/) questions on these *must* reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question *"must fully comply"* with the guidelines set forth in [help], [ask] and [site expectations for good questions](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/618/why-did-i-get-a-downvote). Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Question touches heavily trolled topic and lacks to be expected quality

Current site policy has been the following:

Questions on these topics have a hair-trigger for being put on hold. This goes in particular for new users who don't have a proven track-record of asking good questions.

There is a certain quality bar that all questions on SE sites in general, and this site in particular, must reach in order to remain open. However, questions on these topics in particular, due to excessive past abuse, are not given nearly as much leeway.

These questions can't be sort of on topic, or even mostly on topic, they must be fully on topic. They are expected to fully comply with our SE help center guidelines, and with our site expectations for good questions. Any issues with this that are pointed out in comments, particularly those with multiple upvotes, are expected to be promptly acted upon by the poster. User edits to fix perceived problems should not be blindly reverted. If this is a problem for a new user, they should probably start their participation experience with another topic where the standards aren't as strict.

Text:

as inspiration to be used in such situations that are not just full-on trolling:

Welcome! Please consider this: According to site policy for very heavily trolled topics: questions on these must reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question "must fully comply" with the guidelines set forth in help, ask and site expectations for good questions. Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Source to copy & paste:

[Welcome!](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3988) Please consider this: [According to site policy site policy for very heavily trolled topics](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3683/) questions on these *must* reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question *"must fully comply"* with the guidelines set forth in [help], [ask] and [site expectations for good questions](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/618/why-did-i-get-a-downvote). Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.
Source Link
LаngLаngС
  • 69.7k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 21

Question touches heavily trolled topic and lacks quality

Current site policy has been the following:

Questions on these topics have a hair-trigger for being put on hold. This goes in particular for new users who don't have a proven track-record of asking good questions.

There is a certain quality bar that all questions on SE sites in general, and this site in particular, must reach in order to remain open. However, questions on these topics in particular, due to excessive past abuse, are not given nearly as much leeway.

These questions can't be sort of on topic, or even mostly on topic, they must be fully on topic. They are expected to fully comply with our SE help center guidelines, and with our site expectations for good questions. Any issues with this that are pointed out in comments, particularly those with multiple upvotes, are expected to be promptly acted upon by the poster. User edits to fix perceived problems should not be blindly reverted. If this is a problem for a new user, they should probably start their participation experience with another topic where the standards aren't as strict.

Text:

Welcome! Please consider this: According to site policy for very heavily trolled topics: questions on these must reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question "must fully comply" with the guidelines set forth in help, ask and site expectations for good questions. Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.

Source to copy & paste:

[Welcome!](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3988) Please consider this: [According to site policy site policy for very heavily trolled topics](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3683/) questions on these *must* reach a high quality bar to remain open, especially from new users. Such question *"must fully comply"* with the guidelines set forth in [help], [ask] and [site expectations for good questions](https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/618/why-did-i-get-a-downvote). Questions not conforming to the rules should be closed swiftly.