Skip to main content
replaced http://history.stackexchange.com/ with https://history.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9068/revisionshttps://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9068/revisions has classic "Who is a Jew?" problems.

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9053/revisionshttps://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9053/revisions is grossly out of line with the technical meaning of "everyday life" in historiography. Its a bowdlerisation at best.

I think I skipped one of the tank ones when I checked, might have rejected. It involved (IIRC) controversial assumptions about tracks, turrets.

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9068/revisions has classic "Who is a Jew?" problems.

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9053/revisions is grossly out of line with the technical meaning of "everyday life" in historiography. Its a bowdlerisation at best.

I think I skipped one of the tank ones when I checked, might have rejected. It involved (IIRC) controversial assumptions about tracks, turrets.

https://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9068/revisions has classic "Who is a Jew?" problems.

https://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9053/revisions is grossly out of line with the technical meaning of "everyday life" in historiography. Its a bowdlerisation at best.

I think I skipped one of the tank ones when I checked, might have rejected. It involved (IIRC) controversial assumptions about tracks, turrets.

Source Link
Samuel Russell
  • 14.5k
  • 13
  • 10

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9068/revisions has classic "Who is a Jew?" problems.

http://history.stackexchange.com/posts/9053/revisions is grossly out of line with the technical meaning of "everyday life" in historiography. Its a bowdlerisation at best.

I think I skipped one of the tank ones when I checked, might have rejected. It involved (IIRC) controversial assumptions about tracks, turrets.