Timeline for Is there a better way to handle comments on revised questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://history.stackexchange.com/ with https://history.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.history.stackexchange.com/ with https://history.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 8, 2013 at 2:17 | answer | added | user2590 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 22:44 | answer | added | ihtkwotMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 4, 2013 at 12:52 | comment | added | DVK | What @Luke said. This is what "obsolete" flag was designed for. If the mods determine that it's posing an unreasonable load, they can easily take that issue to meta for community to help/decide. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 17:56 | comment | added | Luke_0 | What if we just flagged them as obsolete? No really. The flagging system is there for a reason and if you've pinpointed which comments are obsolete yourself, you've saved the moderators a lot of work. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 15:58 | comment | added | MCW Mod | True - I offered that as a strawman; I know it won't work, but it is the kind of thing that I think we need. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 14:39 | comment | added | T.E.D. Mod | Well, you can't exactly use numbers, as deleting a single comment near the top will completely throw that off. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 14:32 | history | asked | MCWMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |