6

So I've got something of a monster of a question about the composition and formations of Saladin's army during the siege of Jerusalem. It took a good many hours to research and currently fills four pages of a text document (much of that documenting what I've already learned -- part of it is a 'I'm just a layman, what am I missing here' kind of question). For obvious reasons I'm going to try and edit it, and one option I considered was to break it down into two, three or even four smaller questions. But before I give that a try that wanted to check in about it.

Is it considered bad form here to post a series of questions on the same topic in succession? And if alright, what would be a good posting rate so I don't end up spamming the board?

(And as a follow up, so long as I'm here, how long of a question is too long?)

  • 5
    Unless they become duplicates, the more the merrier, really. – Semaphore Dec 18 '17 at 6:28
  • 2
    I would only add: Do your best to keep both the questions and the expected answers disjoint from each other in scope. – Pieter Geerkens Dec 18 '17 at 15:13
6

No, that is is preferred, for a variety of reasons. Tends towards more precise, questions with more clearly authoritative questions.

I prefer longer questions to shorter - so long as the title and question are crystal clear.

tl; dr - bring it on. A set of questions about a diverse historical character? sounds good to me.

4

There is a limit of six questions per site from the same person within a 24 hour period. That was meant to prevent spam.

A good rate might be one or two per day. That way, you keep the (related) questions close together without "flooding" the site at one time.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .