8

Is intended to be about global history aka "world history"? The SE description isn't too clear to me, although it does seem to lean in that direction

Questions related to the history of the planet Earth and all life and societies and geographical features upon it.

Some questions tagged with it are definitely not of that global-history scope. Reproducing the Wikipedia def:

World history or Global history (not to be confused with diplomatic, transnational or international history) is a field of historical study that emerged as a distinct academic field in the 1980s. It examines history from a global perspective. It is not to be confused with comparative history, which, like world history, deals with the history of multiple cultures and nations, but does not do so on a global scale. World history looks for common patterns that emerge across all cultures. World historians use a thematic approach, with two major focal points: integration (how processes of world history have drawn people of the world together) and difference (how patterns of world history reveal the diversity of the human experiences).

Is the sentence I emphasized a better description? Or is it too narrow?

  • 3
    Just swagging at it, I'd say that's better, but that that one sentence probably isn't enough all on its own as a description. – T.E.D. Apr 7 at 19:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .