In the accepted answer to the question: Did JFK win the presidential election by fraud? I found this: "the claim of voter fraud is just sour grapes from Republicans...." (Which I removed in an edit)
This statement is a pejorative, unsubstantiated subjective opinion that smacks of partisan politics, not History, and is IMO inappropriate for this site.
Why was this answer allowed to remain and marked as accepted? Is this a History site or a political blog? I have strong political views quite different from those expressed in this "answer"(?), (and I do my best to keep them out of my remarks on this site) and found it to be entirely devoid of History and full of partisan bluster, as well as "logic" that is so specious it's not even worth refuting.
IMO moderators should be vigilant about such matters, or this site will quickly degenerate into a pile of worthless rubbish.