Are the questions Is History a subject where certain knowledge is accepted by all historians or can any event be a source for debate? and Are the following 5 tenets of historical record examination considered complete today? on-topic on this site and, if so, why?
Way I see it is that it doesn't meet any of the point mentioned in help/on-topic. i.e:
I think History.se should allow questions about the science of history. They certainly should not be no meta.history.SE, as that is for questions about the site itself.
Historiography questions are on-topic. These two appear to be particularly poor quality historiography questions.
Fascinating question.
In my opinion, the cost of not asking these questions is much higher than the cost of asking these questions. If we are to collectively moderate H:SE, then it behooves us to develop and maintain a common understanding of the goals of that moderation/curation. If we don't agree on what history is, and what kinds of sources should be used, then the site will be vulnerable to dilution, topic drift, and endless arguments driven by well intentioned but mismatched assumptions. Perhaps even the moderators cautioning us not to drive controversy in comments.
It may be that these questions more properly belong in H:SE Meta. I think we've gone back and forth on that, and I'm open to either answer. Or it may be that we need to update the help center to include questions about the practice of history as "on topic".
Agreeing with Lennart Regebro. I suggest these questions should be on-topic. Although this might surprise some because these are about the topic instead of on the topic.
Same has been done in TCS. Quoting Suresh Venkat:
Questions about the field are certainly not off topic. I'm also not in favor of making them meta. I think we will have to live with them on the main site, enforce CW and (maybe) big-list and soft-question tags, and let people who don't like them use tagging to exclude them (this is what I've done on MO, with the soft-question tag)
