Timeline for How to deal with accepted answers that were sourced out of bigoted propaganda/conspiracy sites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2016 at 10:45 | comment | added | user13123 | Could the same person have returned? Or just the same problem history.stackexchange.com/a/30614/13123 history.stackexchange.com/a/30613/13123 history.stackexchange.com/q/30581/13123 | |
May 6, 2016 at 0:23 | comment | added | Marakai | Oh, the irony that I managed to now get into it with someone who accuses me of Neonazi tendencies, apart from other insults. As that person (who uses his real name and I therefore know from Google searches as being a ... difficult <understatement alet> person, I just flag it an move on, but the vileness of the accusations leaves a bitter aftertaste. If anything, it made me make a resolution that I'll be careful with accusations myself, unless they are clearly using such sources. I don't want to follow a similar path of "anything I don't like or agree with is clearly right-wing propaganda". | |
May 5, 2016 at 10:10 | comment | added | Marakai | @T.E.D. Meh, you get used to it. I speak from first hand experience. ;) | |
May 3, 2016 at 12:56 | comment | added | T.E.D. Mod | Marakai - Oh my lord no. I have more than enough work without having to clean up after a horse too. | |
May 2, 2016 at 22:55 | comment | added | Marakai | @T.E.D.Does SE provide you with a grand white charger and shining armour? | |
May 2, 2016 at 13:40 | comment | added | T.E.D. Mod | @Marakai - Oh wow. -6 and counting. I generally have to delete such posts, for the good of both the site and the poster's rep. Off I go with my mop.... | |
May 2, 2016 at 7:44 | comment | added | NSNoob | There is another question open right now based on a neo-nazi source even though OP's intentions are valid as he is seeking to refute the claims made by the nazis. | |
Apr 30, 2016 at 23:30 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 836 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2016 at 22:49 | comment | added | Marakai | Thank you. I will give two concrete example. Fortunately one has already been downvoted to near oblivion Supposed quote from a US newspaper in 1945 about the Western allies murdering nearly 1 million German POWs. Another has an overall inflammatory tone with at least one statement that is unsourced and which I've debunked elsewhere Camera ownership in post-war Germany. This one is a borderline case, but with the OP of the answer then adding a very inflammatory comment, it raised my eyebrows. | |
Apr 30, 2016 at 18:23 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 252 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2016 at 18:15 | history | answered | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |