5

Holocaust denial is both factually incorrect, and offensive. How should it be flagged?

Should it be flagged as "rude and abusive", or should I use "other" and say "lacks citations"?

I'm worried that flagging it as "rude and abusive" is like getting Al Capone for tax evasion - it wouldn't apply if someone, say, posted pseudohistorical content that wasn't offensive.

4

Why are you worried that it won't apply to non-offensive pseudohistorical answers? Just downvote those. Deletion should be used for offensive or rule-breaking post, not as a tool against incorrectness. Similarly, lack of citations is not a reason for deleting a post.

In this case, if you believe the post is offensive, simply flag it as such (i.e. rude and abusive).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .